Tag: Covered Call

  • What is Option Assignment and Is it always bad?

    What is Option Assignment and Is it always bad?

    Option Assignment is one word that a lot of option traders are scared of. For a primer of what is an option assignment, let me share the basic concept first. This is a detailed explanation from The Options Industry Council. You may also learn more from Pete here.

    The option holder has the right to exercise his or her options position prior to expiration regardless of whether the options are in- or out-of-the-money. You can be assigned if an investor or market professional holding calls of the same series as your short position submits an exercise notice to his or her brokerage firms, which in turn, submitted an exercise notice to OCC (or if the brokerage firm is not an OCC Clearing Member, then it would submit the notice to a firm that is an OCC Clearing Member, and that Member would then submit the notice to OCC). OCC randomly assigns exercise notices to Clearing Members in whose accounts have short positions of the same series. The Clearing Member then assigns the exercise to one of its short positions using a fair assignment method, though not necessarily random. You should ask your brokerage firm how it assigns exercise notices to its customers.

    My version-

    If You sold an options at XYZ price, you are now obliged to sell shares (if you sold calls) or buy shares (if you sold puts) at that XYZ strike price when you are assigned.

    That’s it. There is a whole range of FAQ that you may visit to understand Options Assignment and how it works.

     

    Many consider options assignment to be risky. Is it always the case? Should you be worried?

    If you have a friendly broker, options assignment is not something to be worried so much. However, this assumes you know how to liquidate position, are familiar with different trading strategies and can manage your risk well. Let’s take a few scenarios-

    1. Assume you were long AAPL 100 shares ($384.8 as of this writing) and you like to trade covered call option trading strategy so you sold a Jan 400 Call at $11.90. Thus you collected $1190 for each 100 shares. Now assume, by jan expiration AAPL is at 400.25 and you are assigned. Your shares will be sold @$400. Thus you will pocket a net gain of = $2630 [=$1190 + $1540 (= $400 (strike price-$384.6 price when you sold call)]. You made 6.8% in 50days (assuming no portfolio margin else yield will be even higher) and you are left with cash only. No options obligations, no shares!
    2. Assume you are working on other strategy called Cash Secured Put Option Trading Stratgy. In such a strategy, you sold Puts say at $360 strike and you kept $36,000 as deposit with your broker to let you sell 1 put. You will receive roughly $1000 credit. If AAPL is below $360 on Jan expiration, you will be sold shares at $360. You will get to keep $1000 credit and you will also have 100 AAPL shares. Now no Cash, no further obligations!

    So where is the Risk? it all sounds too good to believe. There are risks in this strategies that I shall briefly cover later. If you are interested to know more, pls leave a comment and I shall cover more. But in both the cases as listed above, there is no assignment risk. Isn’t this the option trader wanted when the position was initiated? to sell shares at $400 or to Buy it at $360 vs current market price of $384.8. I am leaving assignment fee/other costs out of the scope of this post.

    Where option assignment gets complicated- is when you have an option spread and especially when you have an unfriendly broker who might liquidate your positions at their will, probably at the worst time. If you have a good broker who gives you time to adjust/close positions, then in that case even option spread is not so complicated or risky. Here is a real-money example-

    Yesterday, for OPNewsletter, we had a Bear Call Spread on Nike (NKE). Essentially-

    • Sold to Open NKE Dec 87.5 Call
    • Buy to Open NKE 92.5 Call

    Yesterday’s closing credit was roughly $430 [risk is $70 (=$500-$430)] and NKE closed at $95.82

    This morning, before markets opened, we were assigned on our Short Dec 87.5 call, thus crediting our account by $8750 (=$87.5 X100);

    Thus post assignment: Cash Inflow= $8750 +$430 = $9,180; and Position is +1 NKE Dec 92.5 calls and -100 NKE shares.

    Now we are assigned, should we panic? May be yes, if we don’t know what to do about it? and if we don’t know what is an option assignment and how to handle it.

    1. First scenario – NKE flies: It rally above $100 or whatever number you can think of. No matter what happens, the maximum risk is already defined; the position is covered by the long $92.5 calls. You can’t lose beyond that $70 plus assignment fee/brokerage costs, etc.
    2. Second Scenario-   NKE drops: This will actually make money. Let’s say it dropped to $95 (as it did today). You con buy the shares at $95, thus cash outflow =$9,500 and then sell the NKE $92.5 call at $400

    Thus total Cash Outflow = $9,500-$400=$9100,  Overall gains: Cash Inflow- Cash Out Flow = $9180-$9100= +$80

    This was a real trade (prices in the above examples are approximate).

    The example I shared above can be used to examine other kinds of spreads as well.

    Before you conclude that option assignment is always a good thing, pls note that there are risks that one is exposed to.

    • For instance, if someone is trying to trade via predicting the markets e.g. buy NKE shares at the lowest point and sell 92.5 calls at the highest points, that might backfire if market continues only in direction and if that happens to be against the trader’s remaining opened position.
    • Other risk, as I mentioned before, is that your broker fulfills your obligation at his will and you are left with no choice. For example, he buys the shares at the highest and doesn’t sell the 92.5 calls. You may have to sell it at low price, thus resulting in losses.
    • There are costs/broker’s fee associated with options assignment.

    Bottomline- I personally don’t think one needs to be scared of the options assignment. Get to know your broker, understand how do they work in such circumstances. Know your position and familiarize yourself with your trading platform and order types to know how/what can you do during such situations. You will be either short or long shares , thus incremental long or short delta.You can close the trade in a single order as well (to avoid directional risk) e.g. +100 shares and -1 NKE Dec 92.5 call

    Overall, I personally think options assignment can be a good thing. If someone assigns me during the mid of the month, I get to keep all the theta in advance. Other times when I didn’t have theta, I used some simple intraday ranges to close the positions.

    Enjoy and learn more about options assignment. Then comeback and review this post once again.

    Profitable Learning, OP

  • How to Trade Fear

    So you have been watching this “interesting” stock market. One day down, next day up and in the end you don’t seem to find any “wealth effect” in your stock portfolio. And then there is this marvelous VIX, Uncle Ben’s bullish notes about subdued inflation, bullish economic data and you think everything seems to be going in the right direction. Then you see commodities surging, Gold and Silver making record high almost non-stop while US Dollar tanking. It’s an “interesting” market.

    VIX is almost at 3 year low and headlines will give one an impression that everything is brilliant, that market participants are complacent and satisfied and that risk is almost non-existent (Well, isn’t that what Uncle Ben wanted?). Part of the story I already shared on yesterday’s site i.e. VIX futures are reflecting uncertainty in longer term as opposed to shorter term. Now, let me share a chart (via Zero Hedge) reflecting fear as measured by indices that are not’s used, generally, in mainstream media. I had heard about these indices before but frankly it was originally Zero Hedge that connected the dots first (read more here). This is sharing those dots while adding a few trading ideas.

    The chart above has three indices in it. Let me explain the above chart-

    (more…)

  • How to Play Transocean (RIG) via OptionTrading

    How to play elevated Implied Volatility on Transocean (RIG), was a key question in lot of trader’s mind. In fact, it still is. This post is about one of the option + stock trading strategy that can be employed to play such scenarios assuming you are willing to hold the stock for long term.

    A little bit of background– On April 20 Deep Horizon Oil Rig exploded resulting into one of the largest environmental disaster on the face of earth. Since the initial estimates of 1,000 barrels per day leak has morphed into a monstrous 100,000 barrels/day. Since then BP’s market cap has been cut into half (over $90 Billions). OPNewsletter members profitably played a market neutral (but speculative) option trading strategy on BP and got out on May 5th, when BP was still a $50 stock.

    Together with BP, Transocean (RIG) also nose dived and we decided to play a bull call debit vertical spread as soon as BP’s TOP KILL started to function and it reported 70% success chance. It failed and so did our Transocean trade (we still have 24 days if that pleases the hearts). The RIG dipped all the way to $41.88, a five year low and by then IV jumped over 100%.

    So how to take advantage of this set-up?

    So the Trade set-up is-
    RIG, as I consider, is a quality stock and based on my understanding, it doesn’t have to pay any huge sums for the spill. The business will be affected due to ban but they will gain more later as this ban is going to create a supply/capacity crunch a little later on. It is at multiple year low and I am ok to take risk. So I assume to buy, for example, 200 stocks at $48.96

    The IV is unusually high, so I choose to write a call against my 100 stocks and write naked 1 put (to purchase another 100 stocks if I am assigned).

    • Purchased 100 stocks at 48.96
    • Sold Jul 50 Call @ $3.80
    • Sold Jul 50 Put @ 4.95

    If by July options expiration RIG stays above $50, I shall be making $979 excluding commissions. That’s about 10% returns for almost a month’s hold and assuming stock moves up only $1.04. I assume cost as =$48.96*200= $9,792; though less than 1/3rd will be used (thus about 30% profits) due to portfolio margining, but let’s assume this to be the case on a conservative side.

    Here are the transaction prices of a real trade-

    RIG Trade for OP ArticleThe break even point is $45.10-
    =[(48.96*100 (upfront stock purchase) +50*100 (if RIG is assigned for the puts sold))-(380 (call credit) +495(put credit))]/2 i.e. I shall be purchasing 200 shares at $45.10 as opposed to $48.96.

    RIG High IV Trade
    RIG High IV Trade

    The results will be somewhat similar to covered call option trading strategy except the fact that effective capital employed in the latter case is higher vs. option#1.

    So let’s recap, key criteria for this relatively simple strategy are-

    1. You have to have absolute conviction in the long term holding of stock. Remember what goes down can go down further.
    2. Implied volatility allows generating roughly 10% returns for 1 month holding period (assuming full 200 shares)
    3. Your trading account allows you to write calls and naked puts.
    4. The trading account is well capitalized
    5. A clear cut risk management plan should be in place before you trade this strategy. The returns are good on expiration but between opening of trade and expiration anything can go against the trade.

    Disclaimer- I have this trade in addition to multiple other trades on RIG but I may change my positions anytime. This trade is already making money and I have replaced stocks by options before close yesterday so as to reduce my delta. I may get in with the stocks again. The intention here is to share an example for educational purpose.

  • OPNewsletter (Jul’09) +3.55%

    Last week markets tried very hard to rally but ended in negative territory. Market’s character can now be defined by more of “withdrawal of demand” vs anything else. For overall OPNewsletter, we have invested 38.7% of assumed 10K capital. As of last Friday close, we are up +3.55% x-commissions and +2.2% including commissions. I usually aim for +60% capital deployment but overriding philosophy here is “preservation of capital is more important that missing a potential investment opportunity”.

    As of Friday closing, here is an update on OPN portfolios-

    • IWM is down -0.47%
    • X is up +4.50%
    • GDX is up +5.13%
    • DIA is up +5.26%

    This doesn’t include returns on speculative trades of either VIX or RIMM.

    As I shared earlier, market internals are deteriorating day by day. I don’t know when will the tide turn upside down. [b]If you have a long stock portfolio, you may want to erect defense lines while the IVs are lower and defense will be cheaper]. There is no harm in reducing the gains in order to protect and preserve capital. Making money is not difficult, preserving it is.

    If you would like to sign-up for the OPNewsletter, pls click here to reserve your place. Or if you would to read what other customers think, pls click here to read subscriber’s testimonials.

    Profitable Trading, OP

    (This post is 2 days old, original post was published on the forum for OPN Members)

  • OPNewsletter Jun’09 is up 7.34% (Open)

    OptionTrading|Recent Market MovementA week in which Dow moved between +2.5% to -1.75%, S&P500 from +3.25% to -1.5% and RUT from +4.75% to -1.50%, and all closing in negative territory, OPNewsletter gained +2% that too after increasing capital investment by 36% over last week. Overall OPN is up +7.35% (x- brokerage commissions) and +5.3% (including commissions). This excludes bonus trade gains from GDX straight calls, GMCR and POT. We have invested almost 57.3% of 10K assumed capital across various sectors and diversified strategies.

    Sectors include – Steel, Gold, Transport, Overall General Market and Strategies include Iron Condor, Calendars and Covered Calls.

    • GDX is up from -2.27% last week to +5.3% (and BTW GDX moved almost $5 in last week, and those straight speculative calls might have doubled)
    • X is up from -1.15% last week to +9.6%
    • UPS is down from +3.88% last week to -5.11%
    • RUT Iron Condor is up from +9.6% to +18.27%
    • IWM is up from +12% to +17.78%
    • DIA is up +3.4%

    This doesn’t include returns on POT (>+30%), GDX (almost double) and GMCR(>+5%). If you would like to join OPNewsletter, pls click here.

    This 2nd leg of rally since early May has been characterized by thin volumes. The volume is increasing on the down days and reducing on the up days, showing signs of increasing market fatigue and probably some degree of further market weakness could be ahead. Will a limited correction be followed by another attempt at new rally highs? Or, is it possible that a decline back to the March lows, or below, could occur in the weeks or months ahead? As Market Veteran Richard Russell of Dow Theory says- “Dollar down, bonds down, gold up, it all fits together — trouble.”

    We’ll address more issues when market returns to full trading volume post long weekend holidays.

    Profitable Trading, OP

  • OPNewsletter : May’09 (+11.2%), Jun’09 (Opening Shortly)

    It feels great when a single covered call option spread (done only @ 7.3% of 10K portfolio) can deliver OPNewsletter monthly subscription fee, cover commissions and still deliver profits, without making adjustments throughout the holding period. And what if the newsletter doesn’t get a single cent if doesn’t deliver profits? Welcome to OPNewsletter (A “No Profit, No Fee” Newsletter)! It is up +11.2% (x-brokerage) and +8.5% including commissions for May’09 alone (a 16th positive month out of 17 months.).

    As I stated earlier, after many months of waiting, we crossed our 60% portfolio investment guideline. It’s always an advantage if the trading capital was preserved. Yes, we did have a few months of low positive returns, but that preserved capital is an out performance in itself (vs. general markets) and now we can start using this preserved capital for further gains vs. wasting energy in recouping the losses.

    Maximum investment incurred this month was +64.4% and we are continuing to use that as basis for returns calculation even though we are now in credit generation phase. We have +51.19% in cash (assuming 10 k portfolio) that we can start using for opening June’09 portfolio shortly.

    We are nicely positioned to reap further gains and we still have 2 weeks to go for May expiration. I don’t have to worry so much about the market fall as that will further benefit our portfolios particularly IWM.

    1. USO is up +5.36%
    2. UPS is up +4.8%
    3. IWM is up +7.19%
    4. GDX is up +4.04%
    5. X covered call was rolled after +23.29% gains
    6. HAL was closed for +22.69%
    7. AMZN was closed for +15.83% and
    8. IBM was closed for +23.01%

    OPNewsletter has been using Fundamental, Technical, Greeks’ as well as Market Psychology for trade analysis to create our portfolios and diversified into different sectors (Markets, Gold, Oil, Tech, Retailer, Transports, etc).

    dow-may-1-2009We didn’t do an Iron Condor for the 2nd month as I still don’t feel it is the right environment. Though, in retrospect it may seem that it is/it was but I am not convinced. See attached chart, Dow up almost 45 points in 3minutes before close, manipulations any one?

    I am thankful all the OPN members (old as well as current subscribers). Thanks for advocating OPN to your friends, colleagues and trading buddies. This has been helpful in adding constant stream of new members and still maintain the quality.  I am also thankful to all the members for participating in the forum and expanding knowledge horizon of other members.

    If you would like to sign-up or benefit from Jun’09 portfolios of OPNewsletter, pls click here to sign-up for the waitlist.

    Looking forward to opening June’09 income portfolios,

    Profitable Trading, OP