<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who is defying The “D” word</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.optionpundit.net/trade-ideas/gmcr-top-reversal/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.optionpundit.net/trade-ideas/gmcr-top-reversal</link>
	<description>OptionTrading &#124; Powerful OptionTrading Strategies for Consistent Income</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 01:21:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green Mountain Too Hot to Hold &#124; Hot Stocks &#124; Barrons &#124; Markets</title>
		<link>http://www.optionpundit.net/trade-ideas/gmcr-top-reversal/comment-page-1#comment-59848</link>
		<dc:creator>Green Mountain Too Hot to Hold &#124; Hot Stocks &#124; Barrons &#124; Markets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 07:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.optionpundit.net/?p=1626#comment-59848</guid>
		<description>[...] at the company&#8217;s profits through purchases from royalty-paying licensees. A few weeks back I published my bearish bias contrary to what Zacks had (Aggressive Buy) and suggested two different ways to trade GMCR. With [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at the company&#8217;s profits through purchases from royalty-paying licensees. A few weeks back I published my bearish bias contrary to what Zacks had (Aggressive Buy) and suggested two different ways to trade GMCR. With [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
