<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JNJ and COP announce Stock buyback? So what?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.optionpundit.net/strategy/jnj-and-cop-announce-stock-buyback-so-what/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.optionpundit.net/strategy/jnj-and-cop-announce-stock-buyback-so-what</link>
	<description>Powerful option trading strategies for consistent income. Credit spread, Iron Condor, Calendar spread, Double Diagonal, Income Spread.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: OptionPundit</title>
		<link>http://www.optionpundit.net/strategy/jnj-and-cop-announce-stock-buyback-so-what#comment-4407</link>
		<dc:creator>OptionPundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 05:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.optionpundit.net/strategy/jnj-and-cop-announce-stock-buyback-so-what#comment-4407</guid>
		<description>Dave, thanks for an excellent point. 
This is surely a case as "management" is answerable to its investors on the money beging  invested.

Regards, OP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, thanks for an excellent point.<br />
This is surely a case as &#8220;management&#8221; is answerable to its investors on the money beging  invested.</p>
<p>Regards, OP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gricey</title>
		<link>http://www.optionpundit.net/strategy/jnj-and-cop-announce-stock-buyback-so-what#comment-4377</link>
		<dc:creator>gricey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.optionpundit.net/strategy/jnj-and-cop-announce-stock-buyback-so-what#comment-4377</guid>
		<description>Hi OP,

There was one criteria I think you missed. Companies, that are obliged to their shareholders, have to review the purchase of their own shares in this light. i.e. they have to believe that their own stocks represents a sound investment that will return profits for their shareholder. The sort of considerations they would balance include, are there any other take-over targets that may achieve similar returns, or are their investments in other companies (non-controlling ownership) that represent better value.

Thus, companies buying up their own stock must believe there is value in it as a stand alone investment (the other benefits aside) and hence why it makes these stocks attractive to investors.

Just my 2 cents worth!

Regards, Dave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi OP,</p>
<p>There was one criteria I think you missed. Companies, that are obliged to their shareholders, have to review the purchase of their own shares in this light. i.e. they have to believe that their own stocks represents a sound investment that will return profits for their shareholder. The sort of considerations they would balance include, are there any other take-over targets that may achieve similar returns, or are their investments in other companies (non-controlling ownership) that represent better value.</p>
<p>Thus, companies buying up their own stock must believe there is value in it as a stand alone investment (the other benefits aside) and hence why it makes these stocks attractive to investors.</p>
<p>Just my 2 cents worth!</p>
<p>Regards, Dave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
